“NDCITYLINEIAKS”-SYSTEM:
A MODULE-LIKE DECENTRALIZED
B.
ERHARDT1, K. FISCHER1,J. KASBOHM 2, LÊ ĐỨC
NGÂN3, LÊ THỊ LÀI4,
H. WESSEL5, NGUYỄN THỊ HỒNG6, LÊ THỊ
KIM OANH6, DOANH MINH VŨ7,
1iaks GmbH,
5Moskito-GIS GmbH, Dortmund,
Germany; 6University of Greifswald, Institute of Geography and
Geology, Greifswald, Germany; 7People’s Committee of Nam Định
Province, Dept of Natural Resources and Environment;
8Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety and Energy
Technology UMSICHT, Oberhausen, Germany
Abstract: “NDcitylineiaks”-system
is a complex wastewater treatment concept developed for
The approach of trickling filter
technology for the WWT-process reduces remarkable the costs for the
construction, the operating costs and the area consumption in comparison to
common used activated sludge technology.
A linked municipal sewage and solid
waste management and a specialized facility management increase the volume and
efficiency of by-products. The mentioned orientation of management components
supports new settlement of companies in direct neighborhood of treatment
plants. In result of a successful strategy of industry settlement, the
approaches of by-products create chances to refinance the investment and the
operating costs in a certain time connected with lower costs for settled
enterprises.
The “NDcitylineiaks”-system
considers ecological aspects by reusing natural resources and a full recycling
concept. It supports directly the future economic development of local industry
and offers chances to link industrial and agricultural development in the region
(e.g. via food processing industry). Finally, the lower costs and the presented
option for refinancing offer better chances to construct WWT-plants without
increase of any further fees for the population following the demand for safety
of supply in the sense of sustainability.
I. INTRODUCTION
One of the main environmental problems in Việt
A sustainable concept for wastewater treatment has to consider economic, ecological and social criteria. These criteria have to be weighted for a sustainable decision between different action alternatives. A typical tool of sustainability, study on material flows, shall offer also new opportunities to develop concepts of WWT-facilities.
Material flow analysis as part of resource management can assist the identification of so-called by-products from wastewater and sludge treatment processes. Reusing treated water for industrial purposes, methane gas, low and high temperature heat, cool, electricity, CO2 converted into biomass, activated carbon, heavy oil, coal, fertilizer are the first selection of possible by-products. The approach of those by-products can reduce the operating costs and offer additional income sources for the WWT-plant.
Moreover, a synthesis of wastewater and solid waste management creates also further options to increase the amount of possible by-products.
This paper describes an innovative engineering-technical solution and
its embedding in a future sustainable wastewater treatment concept for
II. THE LOCATION –
This city covers a total area of 4,622 ha where the inner city accounts for 1,864 ha (40 %) and the suburban areas to 2,758 ha (60 %). The city has currently 254,700 inhabitants where 203,800 people (80 %) live in inner districts, but only 50,900 people (20 %) live in the suburban areas [6].
The GDP of the city reached more than 2,032 bill. VND in 2007. In the last 10 years, it rose two times and it represents now about one fourth of the GDP of the whole province. Industrial production and construction account for 48.6 % of the GDP. The average economic growth rate of the last five years was 10.5 %. The value of industrial production increased in the same time by about 20.5 %. Trade and services increased by about 8.5 %. As industry, trade and services grow the agricultural land is reduced from 2,400 ha to now 1,600 ha. In there about 1,200 ha are water rice culture. Nevertheless, the annual output could be increased by 3.3 % and reached 110 bill. VND in 2007. Currently industry and construction account for 56 %, services for 42 % and agriculture for 1.9 %. The city plays an important role for the industrial development of the province: two third of the provincial industrial production takes place in the city [8].
- Temperature:
Annual average temperature +23.7 °C
Average temperature in the summer +27.8 °C
Average temperature in the winter +19.5 °C
- Humidity:
Annual average relative humidity 84 %
Maximum relative humidity 94 %
Minimum relative humidity 65 %
- Rainfall:
Annual average rainfall 1830 mm
Maximum daily rainfall 350 mm
- Wind velocity:
Average wind velocity 2.4 m/s
- Wind direction:
The main wind direction in summer: southeast
The main wind direction in winter: northeast
The authorities of
Furthermore,
The extension areas include Nam Vân commune, Nam Trực district,
Trực Ninh district in the north; the communes Lộc Hòa, Lộc
Vượng, Lộc Hà ward in the north-west and Vu Ban district in
the west and southwest. After the expansion of the administrative borders, the
area of
The industrial development of the city will be enforced also in the
future.
III. THE WATER
SITUATION IN
The main source of water supply is the
Based on investment of the French organization, the two further small-scale waterworks in Nam Phong and Nam Vân communes meets the water demand of inhabitants, offices and units in these areas. In 2008 the number of households that are connected to the central water supply system and can use tap water in the inner city area account for 98 %, in the suburban districts for 74 %. The communes of Lộc An, Mỹ Xá, Nam Vân, Nam Phong and Lộc Hòa show the main deficits of tap water access.
Up to now surface water is main source for daily uses. The water supply company organization is under supervision of Department of Construction and is acting on public interest.
According to subproject of improving urban in
In the storm season, the drainage of the city depends completely on the capacity and operation time of the two pump stations Kênh Giá and Quán Chuột [11].
The wastewater flows through the sewer network to sedimentation ponds
and then is pumped into
The only wastewater treatment facilities in the city are the septic
tanks under the private houses and the sedimentation ponds before the water is
pumped out to the
Groundwater in
In [4] the authors
offer also a short overview to the characterization of the surface water in
Finally, authors in [7]
confirmed for the
Table 1. Surface water composition at selected sites
of
No |
Parameters |
Unit |
Analytical results |
TCVN 5942-2005(A) |
||
I-4 |
I-5 |
I-6 |
||||
1 |
pH |
- |
7.2 |
7.3 |
7.1 |
6 – 8.5 |
2 |
DO |
mg/l |
7.2 |
6.24 |
6.72 |
≥ 6 |
3 |
SS |
mg/l |
112 |
263 |
280 |
20 |
4 |
COD |
mg/l |
35 |
25 |
24 |
< 10 |
5 |
BOD5 |
mg/l |
19 |
13 |
14 |
< 4 |
6 |
Cr (VI) |
mg/l |
0.002 |
0.018 |
0.016 |
0.05 |
7 |
Nitrite (N) |
mg/l |
0.01 |
0.008 |
0.007 |
0.01 |
8 |
DDT |
mg/l |
0.004 |
<0.0001 |
0.0034 |
0.01 |
9 |
Nitrate (N) |
mg/l |
7.6 |
4.7 |
3.9 |
10 |
10 |
As |
mg/l |
0.003 |
0.012 |
0.0087 |
0.05 |
11 |
Oil |
mg/l |
0.12 |
0.10 |
0.18 |
0.3 |
12 |
Detergent |
mg/l |
0.045 |
0.12 |
0.033 |
0.5 |
13 |
Phenol |
mg/l |
0.001 |
0.0013 |
0.005 |
0.001 |
14 |
Total Coliforms |
MPN/ 100ml |
186 |
120 |
1,214 |
5,000 |
Legend: I-4: Water of
I-5: Water of
IV. THE
ENGINEERING-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION FOR THE DOMESTIC WWT-SYSTEM IN
The description of the fast growing development of
Following these three main topics the engineers of iaks GmbH developed the so-called “NDcitylineiaks”-concept. This concept recommends treating the wastewater in a decentralized manner. The stabilized sludge is to pump via sludge pipelines into a centralized sludge treatment plant (Fig. 1). For the wastewater treatment, they offer the use of trickling filters. Possible technologies for the sludge treatment are fouling into methane gas and low temperature conversion into oil, gas and coal. These technologies create different options for a full recycling of sludge (Fig. 2).
Figure 1. General visualization of decentralized
wastewater treatment and centralized sludge treatment
1. Wastewater
treatment
For the wastewater treatment process by “NDcitylineiaks”-concept mechanical treatment with primary settlement, secondary biological treatment and the final clarification are integrated in a closed building avoiding any smell nuisance. Primary settlement and final clarification are carried out by sieves and microsieves (Fig. 2). Denitrification, nitrification and reduction of phosphor are processed by a biofilm technique – a set of trickling filters (Fig. 3).
The wastewater flows by pumping via rotating biological contactors from top side downward into the trickling filters (Fig. 4). The recommended trickling filter consists of a fixed bed of a special plastic media over which sewage flows downward and causes a layer or film of microbial slime to grow, covering the bed of media. Aerobic conditions are maintained by splashing, diffusion, and either by forced air flowing through the bed or convection of air. The process mechanism, or how the removal of waste from the water happens, involves both absorption and adsorption of organic compounds within the sewage by the layer of microbial slime. Diffusion of the wastewater over the media furnishes dissolved air, the oxygen, which the slime layer requires for the biochemical oxidation of the organic compounds and releases carbon dioxide gas, water and other oxidized products. As the slime layer thickens, it becomes more difficult for air to penetrate the layer and an inner anaerobic layer is formed. This slime layer continues to build until it eventually sloughs off, breaking off longer growth into the treated effluent as sludge.
Figure 2. Flow chart for the recommended wastewater
treatment (incl. sludge treatment) in
Wastewater treatment plants using the trickling filter technology have to following in its design and scaling the German regulation ATV-DVWK-A281 on “Dimensioning of Trickling Filters and Rotating Biological Contactors”. The capacity of each facility is controlled by the height of the tower. That is why the real area consumption of “NDcitylineiaks” is only 1,800 m² for the wastewater treatment plus 1.500 m², if sludge treatment should be included. This area of 3,300 m² can serve as full equipped WWT-plant (water & sludge) without any problems for ten thousand to few hundred thousand of population equivalents (PE). In comparison to other WWT-systems like activated sludge (AS) treatment engineers have not to consider the high ground load of water column in the basins needed for these technologies. That means the constructional conditions for the foundation of the towers of trickling filters are much easier to handle than for
Figure 3. The main building
components of “NDcitylineiaks”-system for treatment of wastewater in
Nam Dinh City (biological reactor – trickling
filter incl. equipment for mechanical treatment and clarification by sieve
technology; body for synergistic using – opportunity to develop new production
sites with chances for recycling of cleaned water, for additional
services by washing of polluted air etc. or to integrate this WWT-system also
in central parts of city as public building as well as for commercial purposes)
Figure 4. Simplified flow chart of wastewater treatment (without sludge
treatment) by trickling filter system “NDcitylineiaks” (towers
include in the lower part the denitrification section (DN-reactor) and in the
upper part the nitrification section (N-reactor); this system is mirrored in
two towers by engineering-technological recommendations only; part of water
treatment is located in decentralized sites)
Legend: Zulaufpumpwerk – inflow pump station, Feinsieb – fine
sieve; Microsieb – microsieve;
Beschickungspumpwerk – waste water pump
station; denitrifizierender Tropfkörper – denitrification reactor by trickling
filter (DN-reactor); Luftkanäle umlaufend – aeration channels, circulating;
Nitrifikations-Pumpwerk – pump station to nitrification reactor (N-reactor);
nitrifizierender Tropfkörper – nitrification reactor by trickling filter
(N-reactor); Abluftreinigung – optional treatment of polluted air; Vorflut -
waterstream
AS-technologies. Furthermore, the aerators for AS-technologies are an important factor of investment and operating costs (like electricity and maintenance). The wastewater treatment by trickling filter needs only standard pump stations. In result of that, sites with a high water table, high bedrock, heavy clay, small land area, or which require minimal site destruction are ideally suited for trickling filters. All varieties of sewage trickling filters have low and sometimes intermittent power consumption.
2. Sludge treatment
The sludge treatment section (Fig. 5) contains also a full wastewater treatment unit by trickling filters to treat also the process water originated by sludge treatment. The sludge transport from the decentralized wastewater treatment sites to the centralized sludge treatment plant is planned via sludge pipelines. The fouling is a first step of sludge treatment. About 30 % of sludge is converted into methane gas. This gas can use by so-called CHP-cogeneration with an efficiency higher than 85 % for production of cool (C), low and high temperature heat (H) and electrical power (P). After the fouling process the rest of sludge has to pass a chamber filter press for dehydration. A part of the heat from the CHP-cogeneration is to use for this drying process. In a following step, the sludge is processed by low temperature conversion into new run products like heavy oil, gas and coal. The own energy consumption for this process needs the gas outcome. The new product “coal” shows also properties like activated carbon. That is, why this coal is usable as additional filter for wastewater (as sewage sludge is cleaning sewage) or as long-term storing for energy (e.g. for later firing approaches).
Figure
5. Simplified flow chart for recommended
sludge treatment by “NDcitylineiaks”-system
V. THE SUSTAINABLE
EMBEDDING OF THE “NDCITYLINEIAKS”-CONCEPT
In Chapter 1, it was noted that a sustainable concept for wastewater treatment has to consider economic, ecological and social criteria. A typical tool of sustainability, study of material flows, shall offer also new opportunities to develop innovative concepts of WWT-facilities.
Few different tools of sustainability, which have published [10], can support this development. They translated the three basic topics of the intrageneration concept of sustainability (economy, ecology and social justice) into efficiency, minimizing of environmental impacts and safety of supply validated now also for non-renewable resources. These new terms implicate a further demand to recycle already used resources. For that, they transfer the model of cycle management for renewable resources “Resources - Consumption - Regrowth - Resources” into “Resources - Use - Recycling - Resource” for non-renewable resources. Furthermore, they have developed a so-called Hierarchy of Mineral Raw Materials (Fig. 6). They distinguish between use and consumption of resources. Water and metals are used, but not real consumed. After using of that these resources are again available. In opposite to the most applications of water the heating by fossil resources means a real consumption of resources. Approaching this system they have concluded, which resources are to characterize as precious raw material and which raw material shall be applied to substitute these precious resources. Waste and residues offer in this sense the highest potential as future raw material (Fig. 6). The conclusion for WWT-technologies means now, recycle your resources and use as far as possible waste and residues to create new resources in order to minimize environmental impacts and increase the efficiency of resource using. Waste and residues are available also in sufficient amount under poor and/or low budget conditions.
Following this guideline of recycling, it would be
helpful to analyze the full process of wastewater “production” from the water
consumer to the wastewater treatment and to evaluate the recent waste products
of wastewater treatment, too (Fig. 7). The household and other water consumer
in industrial, residential or agricultural areas are “producing” not only
wastewater, but also solid waste. These waste “products” contain resources
represented for instant by water, BOD, COD, nitrogen, phosphor, potassium and
other nutrients as well as solid organic material. A non-use of such waste can
cause problems of sanitations especially in rural areas. In urban areas,
authorities describe also for
If industrial production sites or agricultural companies receive such by-products for its production, than this WWT-system can support the settlement of new companies creating new jobs in this region and generating new income sources for WWT-plants (Fig. 7).
Figure 6. Hierarchy of mineral raw material (Wellmer
and Kosinowski, 2005) as approach for sustainable concepts of WWT-systems
Figure 7. Visualization of WWT-concept to generate by-products promoting settlement of new industrial production sites
Moreover, a synthesis of wastewater and solid waste management create also further options to increase the amount of possible by-products.
The presented design of water and sludge treatment (Chapter 4) is offering the mentioned series of by-products (Figs. 2, 4). The “NDcitylineiaks”-system contains also a management concept to reduce the starting costs for investment of new sites for production, commercial or public activities in neighborhood of WWT-facility.
Figure 8 demonstrates the options to combine a WWT-plant with industrial productions, e.g. which are producing normally smell and dust. The ventilator system and the trickling filter as main parts of sewage treatment offer now a synergistic system to support a cleaner production for such companies by catching, cleaning an cooling of air. This solution combines the cleaning of air and a cooling of the treated air simultaneously in the trickling filter towers. On this way it is a suitable option to integrate the aeration system of trickling filter technology, which is demanded for the biological destruction of organic matter in the process of wastewater treatment, also in an air cycle management for buildings (including air condition) in neighborhood of the trickling filter towers.
The technology of trickling filter is traditionally well suitable to treat sewage mixed by domestic and industrial wastewater. This design of WWT-plant and this situation concerning the option for mixed sewage treatment offer also chances to combine the sewage treatment from domestic and industrial areas.
Figure 8. Visualization for a synergistic connection
between WWT-plant and industrial production site (a typical synergistic
approach for industrial sites is to catch and wash polluted air caused by
chemical industry, production of construction material, etc.; the already
available WWT-components ventilator and trickling filter offer a perfect
solutions to treat also polluted air)
Figure 9. Visualization for embedding of a city sport
area (e.g. with public pool and open air cinema) in a wastewater treatment
facility as synergistic approach also in central parts of urban areas
Another version of WWT-facility design for central urban areas is visualized in Figure 9. It is no problem to combine the WWT-facility with functions of commercial or public buildings.
Safety of supply was mentioned above as one of three topics for the intrageneration concept of sustainability for non-renewable resources. In the case, the investment costs are to reduce in comparison to other typical technologies of WWT it would be better chances available to establish new WWT-facilities and an improved water quality in rivers and lakes.
Engineers and planners for wastewater treatment
facilities are using models of costs per population equivalents (PE) to
estimate the expecting budget. The iaks GmbH has offered its estimation tool
based on own objects in
Following equations are representing the iaks-database:
- Activated sludge technology:
Estimated costs (€) for sewage treatment: y = 3,756 x0.753
Estimated costs (€) for sludge treatment: y = 434.18 x0.763 (y = costs in €; x = PE)
Estimated area for WWT-facilities: y = 12,353 ln(x) - 92,105 (y: m²; x: PE)
As example two possible planned 75,000 PE units (based on 30,000 m³/day of water supply and 0.2 m³/day and capita) have following estimated costs in European frame:
- Activated sludge technology:
Estimated costs for decentralized sewage treatment: ~ 40.7 million €
Estimated costs for centralized standard sludge treatment: ~ 4.1 million €
Estimated area consumption: ~ 10 ha
Estimated energy consumption: ~ 4,700 MWh per year.
For the selected example it is to explain, that 37,000 m³ of basins constructed by non-water permeable concrete are demanded to fulfill the DWA-rules for the treatment effects [1]: four PE per m³ incl. stabilization of sludge; 430 € per m³ of this special concrete mean 15.9 million €). This sum for basin construction would be already 40 % of estimated total investment.
The data basis for the modeling of trickling filter
(TF) is much smaller. Using few tenders of iaks GmbH and GeoENcon Ltd. and the
known costs for the running system in WWT-plant of
- Trickling filter technology:
Estimated costs for sewage treatment: y = 7,931 x0.604 (y: costs in €; x: PE)
Following this equation the mentioned planned two WWT-facilities with 75,000 PE for each would be characterized for sewage treatment in trickling filter technology by 14.5 million € (that means 1/3 only in comparison to activated sludge technology).
- Trickling filter technology:
Estimated costs for decentralized sewage treatment: ~ 14.5 million €
Estimated costs for centralized standard sludge treatment: ~ 4.1 million €
Estimated area consumption: < 2 ha
Estimated energy consumption: ~ 3,750 MWh per year.
The costs for channel system (38 million €) and standard sludge treatment (4.1 million €) are more or less the same like for activated sludge treatment.
The area demand for trickling filter is depending from the sizes of towers and the machine hall. A rising PE-value is increasing the diameter and the heights of towers, but not the area consumption.
That is why it is allowed generally to estimate less than 1 ha for the full facility for each size.
The offered system to estimate the expected costs for WWT-facilities shows a remarkable advantage for the trickling filter technology concerning investment, operating costs and area consumption in comparison to common applied activated sludge technology.
As next step, it is to introduce in the basic strategy to refinance wastewater and sludge treatment facilities. One option to refinance the wastewater process is a so-called module “WWT & Industrial Park”. Sludge treatment is discussed below separately. Like visualized in Figures 3 and 8, the “NDcitylineiaks”-system offers additional space for development of new production sites in direct neighborhood of trickling filter towers. The concept of by-products includes a partial re-using of treated water as process water for industrial purposes and a synergistic support for building facility management. The synergistic component “facility management” in the module “WWT & Industrial Park” contains the mentioned item “air cycling system” and a so-called item “rental offer for basic infrastructure”. Figure 3 demonstrates the main idea of this item. The investment of WWT includes already first construction of parts of building and few components of infrastructure (tap water- & process water network, air cycling management network etc.). This solution reduces the starting costs for investment of new production sites. The saving for investment for an enterprise is compensated by a rental charge for production activities in this building in a volume requested for a time of 5-7 years.
First model-like calculations show that the new settled industry can cover the refinancing. The re-used water contributes with 35 % in this refinancing budget. The wastewater treatment charge for additional demanded tap water brings 30 % and the support of facility management offers 40 %.
Input data for these model-like calculations are:
- Component “Process Water”:
+ 1/3 of WWT-plant capacity is re-used and treated again
+ 1/3 of WWT-plant capacity is treated because of additional demand for tap water by companies
+ Branches with a high water demand are preferred only
+ Income by “process water” is assumed with 0.07 USD/m³ for treated water (e.g. tap water costs mainly > 0.20 USD/m³) and with 0.25 USD/m³ as retreatment charge
+ Income by treatment charge because of the mentioned additional demand of tap water with 0.25 USD/m³
- Component “Facility Management”:
+ Income by item “air cycling system” with 1 USD/m³ per year for cleaning building volume
+ Income by item “rental offer for basic infrastructure” with annual 40 USD/m² of production site
The refinancing concepts of sludge treatment facilities base mainly on
energetic using of sludge by fouling and further conversion of residual sludge
after the fouling process (Fig. 2). The mentioned by-products originated by
sludge treatment can cover the own energy demand of treatment facility and
support e.g. food processing industry by offering heat and cool. The special
focus to food industry creates also options to improve the income situation in
agriculture of
Those model-like calculations offer only a generalized view to few key values supporting a further planning process and cannot substitute any later detailed engineering processing.
Acknowledgements: The presented documentation is result of
German-Vietnamese cooperation in the project “Integrated Water Resource
Management for Việt
REFERENCES
1. Imhoff K., K. Imhoff, 2007. Taschenbuch der Stadtentwässerung (Handbook
of drainage in urban regions). Oldenbourg
Industrieverlag München.
2. Lê Thị Lài, 2007. Groundwater investigation: Approach tool for the Integrated Water Resource
Management in Nam Định Province. J.
of Geology, B/29 : 59-68. Hà Nội.
3. Lê Thị Lài, Đoàn
Văn Cánh, 2004. Studying and synthetically surveying the groundwater
resource of
4. Lê Thị Lài, J. Kasbohm,
Nguyễn Đức Rỡi, Đoàn Văn Cánh, Đỗ
Văn Bình, 2009. Preworks for a future IWRM-monitoring of water
resources in
5. Nguyễn Thị Hồng,
J. Kasbohm, H. Wessel, J. Hartleib, 2009. GIS-based starting tools of decision
making for wastewater treatment planning. J.
of Geology, B/33. Hà Nội (in print).
6. Niên Giám thống kê Nam
Định, 2007. Ủy ban
Nhân dân tỉnh
7. Pavlik N., J. Kasbohm, Đặng Diễm Hồng, Lê Thị
Lài, 2007. Categorization
of biological water quality using diatoms on example of
8. Sở
Tài nguyên và Môi trường Nam Định, 2007. Báo cáo thực trạng môi trường
9. Sở
Tài nguyên và Môi trường
10. Wellmer F.-W., M.
Kosinowski, 2005. A hierarchy of natural resources with respect to
sustainable development. Z. dt. Ges. Geowiss., 156/2: 247-259.
11. World Bank, 2002.